Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2003-04-15 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2003-04-15 House Journal Page 0986 HB 11 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 11 "An Act relating to deposits to the Alaska permanent fund from mineral lease rentals, royalties, royalty sale proceeds, net profit shares under AS 38.05.180(f) and (g), federal mineral revenue sharing payments received by the state from mineral leases, and bonuses received by the state from mineral leases, and limiting deposits from those sources to the 25 percent required under art. IX, sec. 15, Constitution of the State of Alaska; and providing for an effective date." 2003-04-15 House Journal Page 0987 with the: Journal Page RES RPT 1DNP 7NR 532 FN1: ZERO(REV) 533 FN2: (REV) 533 FN3: (REV) 533 FIN RPT 7DP 2DNP 1NR 664 FN1: ZERO(REV) 665 FN2: (REV) 665 FN3: (REV) 665 **The presence of Representative Williams was noted. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Croft: Page 1, line 6, following "Alaska;" (title amendment): Insert "authorizing an advisory vote relating to the Alaska permanent fund account; relating to certain procedures for the special election;" Page 2, following line 19, insert new bill sections to read: "The uncodified law of the State of Alaska is amended to read: * Sec. 3. At a special statewide election to be set for November 1, 2003, the lieutenant governor shall place before the qualified voters of the state an advisory question of shall the State of Alaska limit deposits to the permanent fund to twenty-five percent of the amounts from the sources required in art. IX, sec. 15, Constitution of the State of Alaska. The question shall appear on the ballot in the following form: QUESTION Shall the State of Alaska limit deposits to the permanent fund to twenty-five percent of the amounts from the sources required in art. IX, sec. 15, Constitution of the State of Alaska? Yes [ ] No [ ] * Sec. 4. The special election shall be conducted in accordance with procedures of general elections." Renumber following bill section accordingly. 2003-04-15 House Journal Page 0988 Page 2, line 20: Delete "immediately" Insert "February 15, 2004" Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Rokeberg objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 11 Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kapsner, Masek, Moses Nays: Anderson, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kott, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Excused: Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Wolf And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that HB 11 be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HB 11 was read the third time. The question being: "Shall HB 11 pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 11 Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 24 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 0 2003-04-15 House Journal Page 0989 Yeas: Anderson, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Joule, Kott, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Nays: Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Gara, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Kapsner, Masek, Stoltze Excused: Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Wolf And so, HB 11 passed the House. Representative Coghill moved the effective date clause. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 11 Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 26 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Joule, Kott, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Nays: Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Kapsner, Masek Excused: Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Wolf And so, the effective date clause was not adopted and the new title follows: HOUSE BILL NO. 11(efd fld) "An Act relating to deposits to the Alaska permanent fund from mineral lease rentals, royalties, royalty sale proceeds, net profit shares under AS 38.05.180(f) and (g), federal mineral revenue sharing payments received by the state from mineral leases, and bonuses received by the state from mineral leases, and limiting deposits from those sources to the 25 percent required under art. IX, sec. 15, Constitution of the State of Alaska." 2003-04-15 House Journal Page 0990 Representative Rokeberg later gave notice of reconsideration and it was taken up then. HB 11 Representative Rokeberg gave notice of reconsideration of the vote on HB 11(efd fld) (page 988). 2003-04-15 House Journal Page 0991 Representative Rokeberg moved and asked unanimous consent that reconsideration of HB 11(efd fld) be taken up on the same day. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The following was again before the House in third reading: HOUSE BILL NO. 11 "An Act relating to deposits to the Alaska permanent fund from mineral lease rentals, royalties, royalty sale proceeds, net profit shares under AS 38.05.180(f) and (g), federal mineral revenue sharing payments received by the state from mineral leases, and bonuses received by the state from mineral leases, and limiting deposits from those sources to the 25 percent required under art. IX, sec. 15, Constitution of the State of Alaska; and providing for an effective date." Representative Rokeberg placed a call of the House and lifted the call. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall HB 11 pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 11--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 24 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Joule, Kott, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Nays: Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Gara, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Kapsner, Masek, Stoltze Excused: Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Wolf And so, HB 11 passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Coghill moved the effective date clause. 2003-04-15 House Journal Page 0992 The question to be reconsidered: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HB 11--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 28 NAYS: 8 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Croft, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Joule, Kott, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Nays: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Kapsner, Masek Excused: Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Wolf And so, the effective date clause was adopted on reconsideration. HB 11 was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.